top of page

Mountain Zebra

Equus zebra

General Description

Scientific Name​Equus zebra ​​

Subspecies: 

  • Equus Zebra Hartmanne (Hartman's Mountain Zebra)

  • Equus Zebra Zebra (Cape Mountain Zebra)

Status: Vulnerable (Increasing)

Total Estimated Populations: 34,979 

Population in Assessed Areas: 1,072 (all hartmans)

Diet: Herbivore - Mostly Grasses, some browse

Male & Female Size: 200-350 kg's

Trophy Size: N/A

Generation Length: 11 years

Reproductive Season: Year Round

Time of Activity: Diurnal

Description: Points that can be used to distinguish the mountain zebra from the plains zebra are....

  • The mountain zebra has stripes on the side of the body that end in a horizontal line the belly lacks stripes and is white. The stripes of plains zebra extend around the belly and may have shady stripes between the main stripes.

  • The stripes of the mountain zebra extend to the hooves but are absent at the bottom of the legs of the plains zebra. 

  • Mountain zebra have a dewlap the size of a man’s hand below their necks. It is absent in the plains zebra

  • The mountain zebra has a unique, bright orange shading surrounding the snout that is absent in the plains zebra.

  • The ears of the mountain zebra are 4-6 cm longer than those of the plains zebra and are thus more prominent.

  • Mountain zebra inhabit mountainous terrain, keeping primarily to the slopes, while plains zebra roam plains areas

  • ​

There are morphological differences between the Hartman mountain zebra and Cape mountain zebra. The Hartmann’s mountain zebra is larger and heavier with a mass of around  275>300 kg and a shoulder height of 150 cm against that of the Cape mountain zebra with a mass of 230-255kg and a height of 125 cm. The black stripes across the buttocks are 2 to 3.5 cm wider in the Hartmann’s mountain zebra than in the Cape mountain zebra. Shortridge (1943) compared the build of the former to that of a horse, while the build of the latter is similar to that of a donkey or wild ass and is smaller and more

slender.

I0000FDxor1U7_Zc.jpg
banner.jpg

Ecology: â€‹Both subspecies are found in drier mountainous areas with a rainfall of 150 to 450mm/annum. They will drink daily if water is available but can survive for several days without it. Although Cape mountain zebra are found at altitudes of 2 000 m they cannot

tolerate snowfalls and move downhill to sheltered kloofs. Kloofs and bush thickets are thus an important shelter from the rain and cold of winter. Suitable vegetation consists of fynbos and karroid or dry mountain grassveld. This includes scrubland and dwarf shrubland communities, providing that they have a relatively high grass biomass, especially of tall perennial grasses.

​

Mountain zebra cannot survive in camps that are exclusively on mountain plateau and need access to mountain slopes and mountain-foot environments in different seasons. The transitional ecotone between the mountain foot and the bordering plains are an essential feeding ground. Hartmann’s mountain zebra are usually found at the foot of mountain slopes while Cape mountain zebra generally inhabit the higher slopes and kloofs. In summer they prefer to remain on the top of plateaus.​

​

The diet consists of 92% grass and 8% dwarf shrubs and herbs. Seasonal movement in search of nutritious grazing with high crude protein content often results in migration

and is a critical form of survival behavior. By preference both sub-species graze between 5 and 15 cm height and consume large volumes of coarse fodder such as grass stems and plumes. The zebra is classed as a non-selective/bulk feeder of intermediate to tall grass. 

 

Mountain zebra compete directly with red hartebeest as they both occupy the same feeding niche. Stocking with too many short grass grazers such as springbokwildebeest and blesbok can be detrimental as they shorten the grass layer and make it unsuitable for the mountain zebra. They are monogastric animals and do not ruminate. Mountain zebra frequently seek mineral-rich ground licks and will take supplementary artificial licks. The most preferred grasses are red grass Themeda triandra, turpentine grass Cymbopogon plurinodes, assegai grass Heteropogon contortus, common bristle grass Setaria sp, bottlebrush grass Enneapogon scoparius and finger grass Digitaria eriantha

​

Mountain zebra are rotational bulk grazers and are very suitable for environments with

sensitive, unstable soils as they have little impact on the habitat. Cape mountain zebra generally inhabit mountain plateaus during the wet summer months and move downward to the slopes during drier, winter months. This movement has been found to correlate with the nutritional quality of the diet. It is essential that ranches and reserves include an adequate summer and winter habitat with sufficient feed. The Hartmann’s mountain zebra prefers the ecotone zones between mountain slopes and dry sandy flats where there is abundant drinking water. They do not feed on the flats unless the food supply in the ecotones and on the slopes is poor. Mountain zebra drink daily and avoid muddy water. If water becomes scarce, mountain zebra will dig in drainage lines up to 1.2 m deep. Feeding takes place during sunny daylight hour.

1000_F_555226114_VM3Mm3DG9N76oqfrmDMM3h5goij9uQkw.jpg
original.jpeg
jannie-swanepoel-060a5594.jpg

Behavior: Mountain zebra are gregarious animals and form family breeding and bachelor groups. Family groups consist of one dominant stallion controlling the herd and 1-5 mares (av. 2.4) with their offspring. The average family group size is 4.7 with a maximum of 13 consisting of one stallion, five mares and seven foals. A definite hierarchy exists between the mares of a family group but although the dominant mare controls the females, she is still submissive to the stallion. The hierarchy of mares is established by fierce fighting. The dominance hierarchy of stallions in a bachelor herd also established by fighting but is not as severe as that of the mares. 

 

The strong hierarchy of dominance among mares in family groups is established by fighting. These fights usually take the form of a series of bites, with kicking and slashing of both fore and hind hooves. High-ranking mares have priority of access to dust baths, shade, drinking and other limited resources. Mountain zebra are very fond of dust baths and will often clear a patch of 2.5 m in diameter, kicking up dust and rolling in it. The same patch is returned to regularly and is used by more than one individual.

​

Friendly interactions between family members include grooming of the head, neck and shoulders by a gentle nibbling. Vocalizing consists of harsh snorts and barking “kwa- ha-ha” as alarm signals and a soft lip smacking of contentment or a short-range contact call. When alerted, a herd bunches and takes flight led by the mare and the weakest or youngest foal. Foals stay with their mothers, while the stallion takes a defensive rearguard position from where he can kick or bite any pursuer. Injured animals are very aggressive and should be treated with caution.

Reproduction: â€‹Mating occurs throughout the year with a slight peak in the mid-summer months of November to March. Mating takes only a few seconds and is repeated hourly for two days. The gestation period is 12 months and foals are born throughout the year with a peak in summer. Mares with newborn foals are extremely aggressive. Foals start grazing at three days and until 3.5 months of age will eat the dung of adults. They are weaned at 10 months. Foals that become separated from their mothers run the risk of being kicked to death by the older mares. Stallions start mating at 5.5-6 years and mares at three years. Mares deliver young for their entire lifespan of about 24 years. After 12 years the stallion becomes infertile and post-mature. Stallions are slightly larger than mares and reach their peak weight at 8-10 years with the adult mass being reached at six years. The maximum lifespan of a stallion is 25-30 years.

Conservation Analysis

Current & Historic range:  The Mountain Zebra is currently found in South Africa, Namibia, and Angola. The Cape Mountain Zebra is endemic to the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, while Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra is found mainly in Namibia, with small populations in Angola and South Africa. It's hypothesized that in historical times the two subspecies were separated by an area devoid of mountains, the Knersvlakte. However there are no historical (pre-1920) records of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra south of the Orange River.

Cape Mountain Zebra's historical distribution extended throughout the great escarpment range in the Cape, including the Cape Fold Belt Mountains (the southern parts of the Western Cape Province), and the southern extent of the Northern Cape province. Although once widely distributed throughout the the Cape, over-hunting and agricultural expansion reduced the population to less than 80 individuals in just five areas of the former Cape province by the 1950s. Only three remnant populations  survived: Mountain Zebra NP, Kammanassie, and Gamkaberg Nature Reserves.

The current distribution of Cape Mountain Zebra is limited to around 75 fenced subpopulations spread across their former range. Subpopulations have been reintroduced to, Karoo, Addo Elephant, Bontebok, Tankwa Karoo and Camdeboo national parks, De Hoop Nature Reserve, Commando Drift Nature Reserve, Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area and Tsolwana Nature Reserve. Two of these reserve populations (Commando Drift and Tsolwana) are possibly extralimital, as there are no historical records of the species east of the Great Fish River. The subpopulation at Gariep Dam Nature Reserve in the Free State Province is significantly extra-limital and not included in this assessment. The West Coast National Park as being within the historical range but there is some doubt about this given that it is on the coast and 70 km from the closest historically-recorded subpopulation in Picketburg. The issue of whether to include West Coast National Park to be within the subspecies’ range has not been resolved. The subpopulation at Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve in the Northern Cape lies in a historical range of Cape Mountain Zebra.

Screenshot 2024-05-18 203028.png

Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra primarily occupy the escarpment region of western Namibia that runs north-south along the entire length of the country and which form the boundary between an arid coastal plain (which includes the Namib Desert in the south and the Skeleton Coast in the north) and a wetter inland plateau. The current range of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra differs from the historical range in Namibia, partly because of the widespread establishment of artificial water sources which allow this water-dependent sub-species to occupy habitat that was previously unsuitable.Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra distribution is broken down into to four subpopulations: (1) The Kunene Region, south to the Ugab River and east to the Outjo District; (2) the Erongo Mountains; (3) the escarpment from the Swakop River south to the Naukluft Mountains and east along the Kuiseb and Gaub drainages into the Khomas Hochland; and (4) the Fish River canyon and Huns Mountains near the Orange River in the south.  There is some evidence for these distinctions in the distribution map. However current information suggests that the three northern ‘sub-populations’ are essentially continuous. This may be due to significant population expansion or from under-sampling in some areas (especially where there are low levels of commercial farm questionnaire returns). The extent to which the Hunsberg /Fish River sub-population in the south is separated needs further investigation.

At the southern end of its distribution Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra extends into northern South Africa and are found in three conservation areas: Richtersveld and Augrabies National Parks and Goegap Provincial Nature Reserve. They have also been introduced outside of their natural distribution range in the Western Cape, Eastern Cape, North West and Free State provinces. At its northern end, the sub-species distribution extends into southern Angola and 263 were estimated in the Iona National Park in a 2003 survey. 

Current & Historic Populations: Mountain zebras were once widespread and numerous, but both subspecies underwent dramatic declines in the 20th centuries, and have subsequently increased. By 1950, hunting and habitat loss to agriculture reduced the Cape subspecies to 80 individuals in three relict populations in the 1950s. In 1998, the number of the Cape subspecies had increased to about 1,200 individuals, with the largest population (in the Karoo National Park), estimated to number 250. From 1985 to 1995 the annual rate of increase was reported as 8.6 %, 9.6 % between 1995 and 1998 , 8.33 % between 2002 and 2009 and 9.16% between 2009-2015. However, estimating annual growth rate trends is challenging because most subpopulations are actively managed (maintained at sustainable stocking levels) and animals are often removed or augmented, which masks true growth rate. In 2014, there was estimated to be 1,714 - 3,247 mature individuals of Cape Mountain Zebra (55%-75% of total population ).

 

A survey of animals on both formally protected and private properties found that the total population has grown to over 4,790 animals in 75 subpopulations. Fifty six populations (1,487 individuals) are on privately owned land and 19 are on formally protected areas (3,304 individuals). The 69% of the population remains on formally protected land and the proportion on privately-owned land (31%) has not risen since 2009, despite the increase in subpopulation number. The MZNP and Karoo NP subpopulations continue to make up a significant proportion of the population, 25% and 18%, respectively. There are therefore a total of 2,306-3,971 mature Mountain Zebra in South Africa, with an increasing population. However about 30% of Cape Mountain Zebra, and 25% of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra are located on private land, and the Mountain Zebras on protected areas are isolated.

In 1998, the Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra population was estimated to number about 25,000, or approximately 8,300 mature individuals in Namibia. Limited data in 2008 indicated that populations were increasing on communal lands in the north-west of Namibia, where from 2000 - 2006 numbers increased from 6 to 27 individuals observed per 100 km of road surveyed. Nearly a decade of above-average rainfall likely caused this increase. The national total of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra is currently estimated at 44,712 with an average density of 0.45 per km². This is likely an underestimate because it precludes proper estimation of animals on private farms and freehold conservancies. It should be noted that there has been a massive decline in zebras over the last 2-3 years due to the current drought. 

In Angola, a recent survey conducted by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism of Namibia in Iona National Park found an estimated subpopulation size of 263 Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra.

Threats to Species Survival: The greatest current threat to the Cape Subspecies is a loss of genetic diversity through inbreeding, caused by small subpopulation sizes and small property sizes. New subpopulations have been created through translocation of animals, with all but one of these subpopulations originating from Mountain Zebra National Park (MZNP). Two thirds of the genotype is located in just two populations (Kammanassie and Gamkaberg Nature Reserve, while the remaining third comprises of MZNP origin animals. Currently, the SA population of Cape Mountain Zebra is highly fragmented into a large number of small subpopulations yet little metapopulation management is practiced. Founder groups are often small (50% of subpopulations have had a founder populations smaller than the recommended 14 animals), and genetic exchange between subpopulations is poor (73% of private-owned herds have only ever had a single introduction event), thereby increasing the risk of inbreeding and genetic drift. Vulnerability to disease also increases due to inbreeding. The subpopulations at both Bontebok National Park and Gariep Dam Nature Reserve, which have been shown to be inbred and lack genetic diversity, have both had an outbreak of sarcoid tumours (53% and 22% of the subpopulations, respectively), indicating a general immune system breakdown. Development of a metapopulation management plan (and adoption of such plan into provincial and national conservation policy) which incorporates “resource mobilization strategies” (how human/financial resources will be used for implementation) is essential in ensuring the long-term survival of Cape Mountain Zebra.

​

Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra remains at risk of catastrophic decline under future droughts, as experienced in the early 1980s. Increasingly sophisticated farming could further disrupt movements through fencing or by preventing access to surface water. Populations need to be carefully monitored so that harvesting does not adversely affect population viability. However, economical incentives provided through sustainable hunting improve prospects of coexistence with cattle farmers who occupy much of the range. The current harvest rate of this subspecies is little understood, along with how it's effecting current populations. 

Recommended Conservation Actions:

  1. Increased protection from development and poaching in populations close to human settlements, as well as further economic incentives to not overharvest a particular species. 

  2. A development of a meta-population plan for the Cape subspecies, to ensure that genetic diversity is maintained, and to hopefully connect existing populations on private land.  

  3. Create additional incentives for landowners to protect and expand populations in their historic range, whilst ensuring that harvest rates do not exceed growth rates. 

  4. Study the impact of drought on population numbers, as well as the impact of fencing created by an expanding livestock industry. 

  5. Increase surveying capabilities of most of it's populations, especially outside of protected areas, where much about the status of this species is unknown.

Economic & Cultural Analysis

Ecotourism Value: High

Hunting Value: High

Meat Value: Moderate

Average Trophy Value: $800-3,000 USD 

Meat Yield per Animal: 80-120 kg

Economic Value/Impacts: Consumptive utilization of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra in Namibia is allowed through appropriate regulations and a permit system. Permits issued by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism are required for any form of consumptive use in Namibia. The permit system aims to ensure that Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra utilization is sustainable and has no detrimental effect on the long-term survival of the species. Trophy hunting and live capture are the different forms of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra utilization currently permitted in Namibia. The number of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra shot as trophies was 1,820 in 2008 and 1,064 in 2009. The mean number of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra harvested per annum in Namibia (2008–2012) was 3,538, which is not predicted to impact population growth negatively. The number of Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra killed illegally is not known, though poaching rates are low, due to remoteness of populations.  

​

In both Namibia and South Africa, Mountain Zebra are popular attractions of ecotourism, with their presence on a reserve being a major drawcard for international visitors. This has motivated many reserves to return the species to fences areas of their historic range. 

Cultural Value: Both subspecies of mountain zebra have likely been hunted by humans and our ancestors for millions of years, though much less so than their plains zebra ancestors. This is mostly because they were historically far less common, but also because the mountainous areas they inhabit likely protected them to a degree. 

Photo-19-03-2019-19-02-35.jpg
hartmans_zebra-1-1.jpg
bottom of page